From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denoyer v. Pmi Sec. Prot. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 7, 2018
No. 15-CV-4834 (KMK) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2018)

Summary

relying on § 198 to award plaintiff unpaid regular wages at the agreed-upon hourly rate after a finding of liability on default

Summary of this case from Li v. Chinatown Take-Out Inc.

Opinion

No. 15-CV-4834 (KMK) (JCM)

04-07-2018

KAREN DENOYER, Plaintiff, v. PMI SECURITY PROTECTION INC., a/k/a PMI SECURITY SERVICES, a/k/a PMI SECURITY, a/k/a PMI; MANNO ASSOCIATES, INC.; PETER MANNO, SR., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING R&R

:

Plaintiff Karen DeNoyer ("Plaintiff") filed this Action on June 22, 2015 against her former employers, PMI Security Protection Inc., a/k/a PMI Security Services, a/k/a PMI Security, a/k/a PMI, Manno Associates, Inc., and Peter Manno, Sr. (collectively, "Defendants") alleging that they violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. (Compl. (Dkt. No. 1).) After the Court issued an Order of Default, (Dkt. No. 58)), it referred this Action to Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy to conduct an inquest into damages. (Dkt. No. 59). On January 23, 2018, Judge McCarthy entered a Report & Recommendation (the "R&R") recommending that the Court enter a default judgment in favor Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $62,147.13. (Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Dkt. No. 64).) In the thorough R&R, Judge McCarthy provided notice that objections to the R&R were due within 14 days and that failure to object would preclude later appellate review of any order of judgment that will be entered. (Id. at 13.) No objections were filed.

Because no objections have been filed, the Court reviews the R&R "only for clear error on the face of the record." Galeana v. Lemongrass on Broadway Corp., 120 F. Supp. 3d 306, 310 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted); Zhen Ming Chen v. New Fresco Tortillas Taco LLC, No. 15-CV-2158, 2017 WL 818469, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2017) (same). Having reviewed the R&R for clear error and finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.

Accordingly, default judgment tis entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $62,147.13. Specifically, Plaintiff is awarded (1) $16,886.75 in unpaid wages and overtime pay; (2) $16,886.75 in liquidated damages; (3) $27,150.00 in attorneys' fees; and (4) $1,223.63 in costs.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case and to mail a copy of this Order to Defendants at the following addresses:

These addresses are not listed on the docket. Rather, Judge McCarthy directed the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of the R&R to Defendants' last known addresses according to an affidavit of service Plaintiff filed on May 24, 2017. (Dkt. No. 63 Ex. 13.) The R&R was returned to the Court marked "[n]ot deliverable as addressed" from the addresses for Manno Associates, Inc. and PMI Security, but was not returned from the address listed for Peter Manno, Sr. (See Dkt. (entries for Feb. 8, 2018 and Feb. 16, 2018).) --------

Peter Manno, Sr.

Manno Associates, Inc.

PMI Security

6 Wexford Lane

606 Johnson Avenue, Ste. 29

60 E 42nd Street, Ste. 4600

Oceanside, NY 11572

Bohemia, NY 11716

New York, NY 10165Attn: Peter Manno

SO ORDERED. Dated: April 7, 2018

White Plains, New York

/s/_________

KENNETH M. KARAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Denoyer v. Pmi Sec. Prot. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 7, 2018
No. 15-CV-4834 (KMK) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2018)

relying on § 198 to award plaintiff unpaid regular wages at the agreed-upon hourly rate after a finding of liability on default

Summary of this case from Li v. Chinatown Take-Out Inc.
Case details for

Denoyer v. Pmi Sec. Prot. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN DENOYER, Plaintiff, v. PMI SECURITY PROTECTION INC., a/k/a PMI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 7, 2018

Citations

No. 15-CV-4834 (KMK) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2018)

Citing Cases

Li v. Chinatown Take-Out Inc.

§ 198(3). Courts in this Circuit use Section 198(3) to award prevailing plaintiffs damages for unpaid regular…

Perry v. High Level Dev. Contracting & Sec.

Such employment is not exempt from the FLSA's coverage. See Denoyer v. PMI Sec. Prot. Inc., No. 15-CV-4834…