From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dennison v. Pittsburgh Transp. Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 20, 2015
Civil Action No. 14-1189 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-1189

04-20-2015

REGINALD DENNISON, Plaintiff, v. PITTSBURGH TRANSPORTATION GROUP, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Reginald Dennison's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Pittsburgh Transportation Group's Counterclaim against him for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, filed on April 6, 2015. In response to Plaintiff's Motion, on April 16, 2015, Defendant filed an Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim for Unjust Enrichment.

Defendant having filed this amended pleading within twenty-one (21) days after service of Plaintiff's Rule 12(b)(6) motion, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(b), Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Pittsburgh Transportation Group's Counterclaim must be denied as moot. Plaintiff shall file an answer to Defendant's Amended counterclaim within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(4)(A).

April 20, 2015

/s/_________

Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

Senior District Court Judge


Summaries of

Dennison v. Pittsburgh Transp. Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 20, 2015
Civil Action No. 14-1189 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Dennison v. Pittsburgh Transp. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD DENNISON, Plaintiff, v. PITTSBURGH TRANSPORTATION GROUP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 20, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-1189 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 2015)