From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dennis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 19, 2000
763 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Nos. 98-0926, 98-0927, 98-0928, 98-0929 98-0930

Opinion filed January 19, 2000 JANUARY TERM 2000

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; William P. Dimitrouleas, Judge; L.T. Nos. 95-1223CF10A, 95-3200CF10A, 97-21880CF10A, 97-23914CF10A 97-23915CF10A.

Steve M. Glerum of Steve M. Glerum, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gentry Denise Benjamin, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


In 1995, appellant pled guilty to two charges of robbery and was declared a violent habitual offender. The court imposed fifteen year prison sentences, but then suspended them conditioned on successful completion of two years community control followed by ten years drug offender probation. The fifteen year sentences were within the statutory maximum, and could have been imposed without appellant having been declared an habitual offender.

In 1997, appellant violated his community control and entered a plea to the violation and three new robbery charges. The court declared him to be a violent habitual offender and sentenced him to three concurrent fifteen year prison terms for the 1995 cases and the 1997 case.

Appellant argues that he should not have been sentenced as a habitual offender when he violated his probation because the 1995 sentences were not habitual offender sentences. We do not reach that, because, as appellant recognizes, he did not raise this issue in the trial court. Although an illegal sentence can be raised for the first time on appeal, Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), an illegal sentence is "one that exceeds the maximum period set forth by law for a particular offense without regard to the guidelines." Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1196 (Fla. 1995). Because the sentences here did not exceed the statutory maximum, they are not illegal, and cannot be raised for the first time on direct appeal. We therefore affirm.

Nor is this sentence illegal under Mancino v. State, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998) as interpreted by this court in Blakley v. State, 1999 WL 1115453 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 8, 1999).

POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dennis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 19, 2000
763 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Dennis v. State

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 19, 2000

Citations

763 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)