From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dennis v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 24, 2021
3:20-CV-00017-LPL (W.D. Pa. May. 24, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-CV-00017-LPL

05-24-2021

JEFFREY DENNIS, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT B. SMITH, DEPUTY B.J. SALAMON, DEPUTY DAVID CLOSE, CAPTAIN SHEA, MAJOR J.R. BARROWS, LIEUTENANT KOVAC, LIEUTENANT DOMINIC, UNIT MANAGER MILLER, CAPTAIN BAKER, D. VARNER, CHIEF GRIEVANCE OFFICER; COUNSELOR GINTER, SERGEANT YOUNG, SERGEANT MILLS, CAPTAIN ACEY, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-6, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WOOLCOCK, SERGEANT NYMAN, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, Defendants.

cc: JEFFREY DENNIS NG-4948 S.C.I. Smithfield P.O. Box 999 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652 PRO SE Via US First Class Mail Counsel for Defendants


MAGISTRATE JUDGE LISA P. LENIHAN ECF No. 47 MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff initiated this pro se civil rights action on February 3, 2020, and the Complaint was docketed on February 7, 2020. (ECF No. 5) The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 55), filed on February 4, 2021, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Department of Corrections ("DOC") Defendants Smith, Salamon, Close, Dominic, Shea, Barrows, Kovac, Miller, Baker, Varner, Ginter, Young, Mills, Acey, Woolcock, Nyman, and Wetzel (ECF No. 47) be granted in part and denied in part. Service was made on Plaintiff via first class mail to his address of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections, and that unregistered ECF users were given an additional three (3) days pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d). No objections have been filed.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2021,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Department of Corrections ("DOC") Defendants Smith, Salamon, Close, Dominic, Shea, Barrows, Kovac, Miller, Baker, Varner, Ginter, Young, Mills, Acey, Woolcock, Nyman, and Wetzel (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 55) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated February 4, 2021, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall terminate Defendants Ginter, Miller, Young, and Baker from the docket.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be given permission to amend his claims of retaliation under the First Amendment against any other specific defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be allowed 30 days from the date of service of a copy of this Memorandum Order to file a Second Amended Complaint.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

Kim R. Gibson

United States District Judge

cc: JEFFREY DENNIS

NG-4948

S.C.I. Smithfield

P.O. Box 999

1120 Pike Street

Huntingdon, PA 16652

PRO SE

Via US First Class Mail

Counsel for Defendants

(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)


Summaries of

Dennis v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 24, 2021
3:20-CV-00017-LPL (W.D. Pa. May. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Dennis v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY DENNIS, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT B. SMITH, DEPUTY B.J…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 24, 2021

Citations

3:20-CV-00017-LPL (W.D. Pa. May. 24, 2021)