From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dennis v. Huskey

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 21, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0102 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0102 FCD EFB P.

May 21, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2007, C. Huskey, the sole defendant in this case, filed a motion for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in pertinent part that "[a]ll motions . . . filed in cases wherein one party is incarcerated and proceeding in propria persona, shall be submitted upon the record without oral argument unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Such motions need not be noticed on the motion calendar. Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed with the Clerk by the responding party not more than eighteen (18) days, plus three (3) days for mailing or electronic service, after the date of service of the motion."

A responding party's failure "to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions." L. R. 78-230(m). Failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." L. R. 11-110. The court may recommend this action be dismissed with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if plaintiff disobeys an order or the Local Rules. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1252 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiff's complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an amended complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff's failure to comply with local rule regarding notice of change of address affirmed).

On August 29, 2006, the court informed plaintiff that all motions must be briefed in accordance with Local Rule 78-230(m), and that failure timely to oppose a motion may be deemed consent to the relief requested in the motion. Also on that date, the Clerk of the Court served on plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of this Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Dennis v. Huskey

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 21, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0102 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2007)
Case details for

Dennis v. Huskey

Case Details

Full title:SAVON D. DENNIS, Plaintiff, v. C. HUSKEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 21, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0102 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2007)