From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dennis v. Burt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2020
Case Number: 2:20-CV-11156 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2020)

Opinion

Case Number: 2:20-CV-11156

06-19-2020

WILLIAM DENNIS, # 927594, Petitioner, v. SHERRY BURT, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO REFILE PETITIONER'S MOTION AND PETITION (ECF NO. 1) IN CASE NO. 2:18-cv-12197 AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

In 2018, Petitioner Williams Dennis filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his convictions for two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520b(1)(b), and one count of third-degree criminal sexual conduct, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520d(1). On September 16, 2019, the Court denied the petition because it was filed outside the one-year limitations period applicable to habeas corpus petitions, Dennis v. Burt, No. 2:18-CV-12197, 2019 WL 4439814, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 16, 2019), and denied a certificate of appealability. Dennis v. Burt, No. 2:18-CV-12197, 2019 WL 5864457 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2019).

On April 24, 2020, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum and a Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). (ECF No. 1.) These filings were docketed together as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In his motion for relief from judgment, Petitioner challenges the Court's denial of his habeas corpus petition as untimely. (Id.) In the petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, Petitioner asks the Court to order the warden to produce him to testify regarding his Rule 60(b) motion. After carefully reviewing the pleadings, the Court determines that Petitioner did not intend to file a new habeas corpus petition. Instead, he intended to file these pleadings in his habeas corpus proceeding and the Court will order them refiled in that case.

Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to refile the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum and Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant (ECF No. 1) in Case No. 2:18-CV-12197. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox

SEAN F. COX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 19, 2020


Summaries of

Dennis v. Burt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2020
Case Number: 2:20-CV-11156 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Dennis v. Burt

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM DENNIS, # 927594, Petitioner, v. SHERRY BURT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 19, 2020

Citations

Case Number: 2:20-CV-11156 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2020)

Citing Cases

Dennis v. Burt

Petitioner previously filed an identical petition and motion, asserting the same arguments. The judge in that…