From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denning v. Hartford Life Accident Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 1, 2006
Civil Case No. 05-cv-02596-REB-OES (D. Colo. Jun. 1, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 05-cv-02596-REB-OES.

June 1, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before me on the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Remand [#14], filed May 11, 2006. The plaintiff seeks a remand of this matter for further administrative consideration by the defendant of the plaintiff's claim for long-term disability benefits. The defendant does not oppose this request.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Remand [#14], filed May 11, 2006, is GRANTED;

2. That this matter is REMANDED for further administrative consideration by the defendant of the plaintiff's claim for long-term disability benefits;

3. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED; and

4. That absent the filing of a motion to reopen this case made within 30 days of the issuance of a decision by the defendant on the plaintiff's claim for long-term disability benefits, as described in the plaintiff's complaint, this case may be dismissed without further notice.


Summaries of

Denning v. Hartford Life Accident Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 1, 2006
Civil Case No. 05-cv-02596-REB-OES (D. Colo. Jun. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Denning v. Hartford Life Accident Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE DENNING, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jun 1, 2006

Citations

Civil Case No. 05-cv-02596-REB-OES (D. Colo. Jun. 1, 2006)