From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dennie v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2024
3:24-cv-454-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-454-MOC

11-18-2024

KIMBERLY DENNIE, individually, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant. (Doc. No. 8).

Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on July 19, 2024. (Doc. No. 14). Because Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint, the pending motion to dismiss the Original Complaint is moot. See Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.”); Turner v. Kight, 192 F.Supp.2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motions to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 8), is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Dennie v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2024
3:24-cv-454-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Dennie v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY DENNIE, individually, on behalf of herself and all others…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Nov 18, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-454-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)