From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DENMARK v. N Y TEL CO

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 11, 1980
103 Misc. 2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Term 1980)

Opinion

January 11, 1980

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Small Claims Part, Kings County, BERNARD KLIEGER, J.

George E. Ashley, Frank R. Natoli and Michael J. Toolan for appellant.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

The mistakes committed by the Telephone Company employees in disconnecting plaintiff's telephone did not reach the level of gross negligence or willful misconduct required to create liability under the tariff provisions filed with the New York Public Service Commission. (Hamilton Employment Serv. v New York Tel. Co., 253 N.Y. 468; Long Is. Cent. Sta. v New York Tel. Co., 54 A.D.2d 893; Warren v New York Tel. Co., 70 Misc.2d 794; Eisner v New York Tel. Co., 67 Misc.2d 506; see, also, 58A NY Jur, Telecommunications, §§ 63, 64.)

Concur: BUSCHMANN, P.J., HIRSCH and JONES, JJ.


Summaries of

DENMARK v. N Y TEL CO

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 11, 1980
103 Misc. 2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Term 1980)
Case details for

DENMARK v. N Y TEL CO

Case Details

Full title:BEN DENMARK, Doing Business as STAR LIMOUSINE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1980

Citations

103 Misc. 2d 1055 (N.Y. App. Term 1980)
442 N.Y.S.2d 963

Citing Cases

In re CCT Communications, Inc.

More to the point, the principle that CCT draws from the lower court's conclusion is contrary to both prior…

Veals v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Gross negligence involves the thoughtless disregard of consequences without any attempt to avoid them. (…