From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denlinger v. Rios

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 4, 2024
2:24-cv-10452 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-10452

12-04-2024

ADAM DENLINGER, Plaintiff, v. DAVID RIOS, et al., Defendants.


Honorable David R. Grand, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 17) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF No. 15)

SUSAN K. DeCLERCQ, United States District Judge

On November 8, 2024, Magistrate Judge David R Grand issued a report recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. ECF No. 17. Judge Grand provided 14 days to object, but the parties did not do so. They have therefore forfeited their right to appeal Judge Grand's findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 17, is ADOPTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 15, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Denlinger v. Rios

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 4, 2024
2:24-cv-10452 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Denlinger v. Rios

Case Details

Full title:ADAM DENLINGER, Plaintiff, v. DAVID RIOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 4, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-10452 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024)