From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co., Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 16, 1985
72 Or. App. 180 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

240341; CA A30762

Argued and submitted November 26, 1984

Reversed and remanded February 6, 1985 Reconsideration denied February 22, 1985 Petition for review allowed April 16, 1985 ( 299 Or. 37) See 299 Or. 544, 704 P.2d 114 (1985)

Appeal from District Court, Multnomah County.

David A. Kushner, Judge Pro Tempore.

John M. Wight, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Keith S. Davidson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


Defendant Hunt appeals from a default judgment entered in an action for breach of contract and deceit, contending that plaintiff's notice of application for a default judgment did not conform to the requirements of ORCP 69B. We agree and reverse and remand.

On November 22, 1983, plaintiff served defendant with a notice of intent to apply for a default order, which indicated that the hearing on the application would be held on November 29, 1983. Plaintiff appeared on November 29, 1983, and the court entered an order of default on that date. On December 1, 1983, the court vacated the order on its own motion to hear defendant's motion to modify an order compelling discovery. The court denied defendant's motion and reentered the order of default.

ORCP 69B(2) provides, in pertinent part:

"* * * If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action or if the party seeking judgment has received notice that the party against whom judgment is sought is represented by an attorney in the pending proceeding, the party against whom judgment is sought (or, if appearing by representative, such party's representative) shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least 10 days, unless shortened by the court, prior to the hearing on such application. * * *"

Plaintiff's notice was served on defendant only seven days before the hearing. There is no indication that the ten-day period in ORCP 69B(2) between notice and hearing was shortened by the court.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co., Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 16, 1985
72 Or. App. 180 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DENKERS, Respondent, v. DURHAM LEASING CO., INC., Defendant, and HUNT…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 16, 1985

Citations

72 Or. App. 180 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
694 P.2d 996

Citing Cases

Matter of the Marriage of McCumber

Without compliance with ORCP 69B(2), a default judgment is invalid. Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co., 72 Or.…

Gibbons and Gibbons

Notwithstanding that exception, ORS 19.245 generally is intended to preclude a defaulted defendant from…