From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denise v. Welch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 27, 1934
242 App. Div. 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

June 27, 1934.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Erie County.

Paul V. Sheehan, for the appellant.

Wendell V. O'Shea, for the respondent.


The action against appellant was not commenced within the period required by section 71 of the Stock Corporation Law which is an integral part of the statute under which plaintiff is claiming the right of recovery. ( Hill v. Supervisors of Rensselaer County, 119 N.Y. 344.) (See, also, Matter of Keep, 241 App. Div. ___, decided herewith.) As to the sufficiency of the complaint so far as it relates to the character of the occupation of plaintiff's assignors coming within the statute, we are bound by our former decision ( 239 App. Div. 805).

All concur. Present — SEARS, P.J., TAYLOR, THOMPSON, CROSBY and LEWIS, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

Denise v. Welch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 27, 1934
242 App. Div. 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Denise v. Welch

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED F. DENISE, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE T. WELCH and Others, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 921

Citing Cases

Matter of Powers v. Foley

The board is not bound to continue error in its interpretation of the law governing its powers. Nor does CPLR…

Matter of Kupofsky

(See, also, Matter of Paskievitz, 184 Misc. 320.) Where a statute gives a right unknown to the common law,…