Opinion
CASE NO. C19-05042 RAJ-BAT
11-06-2019
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida, United States Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Objections, Judge Tsuchida's Addendum to the Report and Recommendation, and the balance of the record. The Court concurs fully in the recommendations of the Report and Recommendation.
On August 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed Objections to Judge Tsuchida's Report and Recommendation, noting that the R&R did not address Plaintiff's argument in favor of remand for immediate calculation of benefits. Dkt. # 14 at 1. Plaintiff is correct that the decision to remand for further proceedings or immediate calculation of benefits lies within the Court's discretion. Id. (citing Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 1009 (9th Cir. 2014)). As noted by Judge Tsuchida, however, remand for immediate calculation of benefits is appropriate only where there are no outstanding issues on which further proceedings in the administrative court would be useful. Dkt. # 15 at 2 (citing Leon v. Berryhill, 880 F.3d 1041, 1044 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding remand for a direct award of benefits may be appropriate where "there are no outstanding issues on which further proceedings in the administrative court would be useful.")). Here, because there are still several outstanding issues including reassessment of the opinions of Drs. Valette and Weiss, remand for immediate calculation of benefits is inappropriate. Id. at 2.
Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 13) and DENIES Plaintiff's Objections (Dkt. # 14). The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall provide copies of this Order to the parties and Judge Tsuchida.
DATED this 6th day of November, 2019.
/s/_________
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge