From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denham v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 3, 2022
2:21-cv-049-KJD-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-049-KJD-BNW

11-03-2022

ROBERT C. DENHAM JR, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES DANIELS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Honorable Kent J. Dawson, United States District Judge

On October 15, 2021, the magistrate judge issued an order (#16) denying Plaintiff's motion to amend. Since that date, Plaintiff has taken no action of record. On July 15, 2022, the Clerk of the Court issued a notice pursuant to Local Rule 41-1 warning Plaintiff that if no action was taken in this case on or before August 14, 2022, the Court would dismiss this action for want of prosecution. Plaintiff failed to respond in any manner. Therefore, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and LR 41-1 and good cause being found, the Court dismisses this action for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with Rule 41.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Denham v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 3, 2022
2:21-cv-049-KJD-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Denham v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT C. DENHAM JR, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES DANIELS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-049-KJD-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)