From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deng v. Crawford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Oct 30, 2020
ACTION NO. 2:20cv199 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 2:20cv199

10-30-2020

GUAMAR BAFEL DENG, #A028192263 , Petitioner, v. JEFFERY CRAWFORD, et al., Respondent.


FINAL ORDER

This matter was initiated by petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner Guamar Bafel Deng ("Petitioner" or "Deng") has been held in federal immigration detention at the Immigration Center of America Farmville Detention Center for more than one year. His petition alleges that his continued detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) without a bond hearing violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and he seeks immediate release from detention or an expedited bond hearing. Prior to any court action on the petition, Deng moved to amend his petition to include additional party respondents. The Government opposed both the motion to add parties and Deng's request for a bond hearing.

Deng initiated the proceedings pro se but is now represented by counsel. --------

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for report and recommendation. The report of the Magistrate Judge was filed on September 30, 2020, recommending the court deny Deng's Motion for Leave to Amend his Amended Petition to include additional party respondents, but grant his Amended Petition for a writ of habeas corpus and order a bond hearing, for which the government shall bear the burden of justifying his continued detention by clear and convincing evidence. By copy of the report, each party was advised of his right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. On October 13, 2020, the court received Deng's Objections only to that portion of the Report recommending denial of his request to include additional party respondents. On October 27, 2020, Respondent filed its response to Petitioner's Objections, urging the court to deny Petitioner's motion to include additional party respondents. Neither party objected to the recommendation that Deng receive an individualized bond hearing.

The court, having reviewed the record and examined the objections filed by the petitioner to the Magistrate Judge's Report and having made de novo findings with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed September 30, 2020, and it is, therefore, ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend his Amended Petition to include additional party respondents is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's Amended Petition for a writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED and DIRECTS that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order Petitioner be given a bond hearing at which the government shall bear the burden of justifying his continued detention by clear and convincing evidence.

The Clerk shall provide an electronic copy of this Final Order to all counsel of record.

/s/_________

RAYMOND A. JACKSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Norfolk, Virginia
October 30, 2020


Summaries of

Deng v. Crawford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Oct 30, 2020
ACTION NO. 2:20cv199 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Deng v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:GUAMAR BAFEL DENG, #A028192263 , Petitioner, v. JEFFERY CRAWFORD, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2020

Citations

ACTION NO. 2:20cv199 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)

Citing Cases

Mansaray v. Perry

Petitioner cites various decisions in which comparable or shorter periods of mandatory detention without an…

Abreu v. Crawford

The first factor is given “significant weight” due to the Supreme Court's “concerns about prolonged…