June, 1930.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.
Judgment and order of the City Court of White Plains unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was an issue of fact as to defendant's negligence, and the amount awarded is justified by the evidence. ( Dettmar v. Burns Bros., 111 Misc. 189.)
Full title:CORNELIUS A. DENEHY, Respondent, v. MIKE PASARELLA, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1930
They were entitled, upon the proof, to recover the usuable value of their apparatus during the period they…
Mountain View Coach v. StormsIt is beyond dispute that where a motor vehicle is harmed as a result of a tortious act, the plaintiff is…