From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denario v. Vill. of Stamford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 16, 2017
3:17-CV-37 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2017)

Opinion

3:17-CV-37

06-16-2017

KATHLEEN DENARIO, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF STAMFORD, et al., Defendants.


Thomas J. McAvoy, Sr. U.S. District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report-Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c).

In the Report-Recommendation, Magistrate Peebles recommends that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with leave to amend. No objections to the February 8, 2017 Report-Recommendation have been raised. After examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein. AND:

The Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 5, is hereby ADOPTED. The Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2017

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Denario v. Vill. of Stamford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 16, 2017
3:17-CV-37 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Denario v. Vill. of Stamford

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN DENARIO, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF STAMFORD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 16, 2017

Citations

3:17-CV-37 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2017)