From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dempster v. County

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton
May 5, 1936
184 A. 866 (N.H. 1936)

Opinion

Decided May 5, 1936.

ACTION, for negligence for personal injuries incurred by a prisoner at the defendant's house of correction. He was hurt while doing some required work, under the direction of the superintendent of the house by a defective staging which the defendant furnished.

The court (James, J.) transferred the plaintiff's exception to an order sustaining a demurrer to the declaration.

John J. Moke (by brief), for the plaintiff.

Norris Cotton, Solicitor, for the defendant, furnished no brief.


The case of O'Brien v. County, 80 N.H. 522, is decisive against the plaintiff. It held that counties are not liable for defaults in the exercise of public governmental functions without statutory provision therefor. And the principle of exemption of towns from liability under similar defaults in governmental maintenance, as declared in Doolittle v. Walpole, 67 N.H. 554, and Gates v. Milan, 76 N.H. 135, was invoked. Special reasons suggested in the O'Brien case as possibly confirming the result did not take it out of the application of the general rule.

Exception overruled.


Summaries of

Dempster v. County

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton
May 5, 1936
184 A. 866 (N.H. 1936)
Case details for

Dempster v. County

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE DEMPSTER v. COUNTY OF GRAFTON

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton

Date published: May 5, 1936

Citations

184 A. 866 (N.H. 1936)
184 A. 866

Citing Cases

Maryea v. Velardi

However, at the time Merrill was decided, counties and municipalities both enjoyed immunity. See Opinion of…

Cushman v. Grafton

"The plaintiff does not dispute the principle, settled in New Hampshire, that a municipal corporation engaged…