From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dempsey v. Eberspacher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1909
131 App. Div. 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Opinion

March 12, 1909.

Frederick W. Clifford, for the appellant.

J. Harry Tiernan, for the respondent.


The Municipal Court justice has found that the breaking was caused by the defendant's negligence. The plaintiff, at the time of the accident, maintained in front of her premises a board walk three or four feet wide, in which there was a trap door opening from the sidewalk into the cellar. Directly in front of this walk was a dilapidated stone walk five or six feet wide between the curb and the board walk. The trap door had been out of repair, and did not close properly, for some time prior to the accident, which occurred by defendant's tripping over a projection thereof, which was about an inch higher than the surface of the walk. The evidence discloses that this trap door was wrongfully maintained in a dangerous condition by the plaintiff, and she should not be permitted to recover for the consequences of her own wrongful act.

The judgment of the Municipal Court must be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

WOODWARD, JENKS, GAYNOR and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.


Summaries of

Dempsey v. Eberspacher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1909
131 App. Div. 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for

Dempsey v. Eberspacher

Case Details

Full title:THERESA DEMPSEY, Respondent, v . FREDERICK EBERSPACHER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1909

Citations

131 App. Div. 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
115 N.Y.S. 589

Citing Cases

Farnum v. Montana-Dakota Power Co.

A person has no more right to risk danger to his property than he has to his own person, particularly where,…