From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demoura v. Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 23, 2012
Case No. 1:09-cv-01344-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-01344-LJO-SKO

01-23-2012

ADDISON J. DEMOURA, JESSICA DEMOURA, and JOHN DOE, A Minor through his Guardian ad Litem, ADDISON J. DEMOURA, Plaintiffs v. ANDREW J. FORD, WILLIAM POOLEY, GARY J. GUFFEY, JASON TOSTA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, CITY OF OAKDALE, AND DOES 1 through 40, Defendants.

Bradley A. Post, Esq. State Bar No. 127028 John J. Hollenback, Jr., Esq. State Bar No. 66215 Stephanie Y. Wu, Esq. State Bar No. 268948 BORTON PETRINI, LLP Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF OAKDALE


Bradley A. Post, Esq. State Bar No. 127028

John J. Hollenback, Jr., Esq. State Bar No. 66215

Stephanie Y. Wu, Esq. State Bar No. 268948

BORTON PETRINI, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF OAKDALE

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE LIMITATION OF DAMAGES


STIPULATION

WHEREAS, all parties to the above-entitled action, by and through their counsel of record, met and conferred on January 6, 2012;

WHEREAS, all parties to the above-entitled action, by and through their counsel of record, discussed issues relating to Plaintiffs' recovery of damages against Defendants;

IT IS HEREBY stipulated, by and between the parties to this action, that Plaintiffs ADDISON DEMOURA, JESSICA DEMOURA and JOHN DOE (collectively "Plaintiffs") recovery of damages are limited as follows:

1. Plaintiffs ADDISON DEMOURA, JESSICA DEMOURA and JOHN DOE hereby waive any right or claim they may have to recover any damages relating to or arising out of the operation of Oakdale Natural Choice Collective, against any defendants, including those who are presently, or in the future may become, a party to this action;

2. Plaintiff ADDISON DEMOURA hereby waives any rights or claim he may have to recover special damages against any defendants, including those who are presently, or in the future may become, a party to this action;

3. Plaintiff ADDISON DEMOURA's recovery of damages is limited solely to general and punitive damages (as to the non- Monell claims) arising out of the execution of the search warrant and events connected to the execution of the search warrant at Plaintiffs' residence on July 31, 2007; however, Plaintiffs will not be precluded from offering any otherwise admissible evidence that was in the possession of Defendants presenting the search warrant affidavit to the magistrate that demonstrated ONCC may have been operating in accordance with California's medical marijuana laws; and

4. Plaintiff JESSICA DEMOURA's recovery of damages is limited solely to general and punitive damages (as to the non- Monell claims) arising out of (a) claims arising out of the execution of the search warrant and events connected to the execution of the search warrant at Plaintiffs' residence on July 31, 2007, and (b) lost earnings relating to her employment as a Mary Kay consultant and medical billing associate.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICE OF REBECCA P. MENDRIBIL

By: ____________

Rebecca P. Mendribil, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs,

ADDISON J. DEMOURA, JESSICA DEMOURA,

and JOHN DOE, a minor

BORTON PETRINI, LLP.

By: ____________

Bradley A. Post, Esq.

Stephanie Y. Wu, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant,

CITY OF OAKDALE

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON

By: ____________

Kevin E. Gilbert, Esq.

Kimberly E. Colwell, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant,

JASON TOSTA

ANWYL SCOFFIELD & STEPP, LLP

By: ____________

James T. Anwyl, Esq.

Lynn A Garcia, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant,

ANDREW J. FORD

LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL FARRAR

By: ____________

Eric Daniel Farrar, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant,

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs ADDISON DEMOURA, JESSICA DEMOURA and JOHN DOE waive any right or claim they may have to recover any damages relating to or arising out of the operation of Oakdale Natural Choice Collective (ONCC), against any Defendants, including those who are presently, or in the future may become, a party to this action;

2. Plaintiff ADDISON DEMOURA waives any rights or claim he may have to recover special damages against any Defendants, including those who are presently, or in the future may become, a party to this action;

3. Plaintiff ADDISON DEMOURA's recovery of damages is hereby limited solely to general and punitive damages (as to the non-Monell claims) arising out of the execution of the search warrant and events connected to the execution of the search warrant at Plaintiffs' residence on July 31, 2007; however, Plaintiffs will not be precluded from offering any otherwise admissible evidence that was in the possession of Defendants who presented the search warrant affidavit to the magistrate judge that demonstrated ONCC may have been operating in accordance with California's medical marijuana laws; and

4. Plaintiff JESSICA DEMOURA's recovery of damages is hereby limited solely to general and punitive damages (as to the non-Monell claims) arising out of (a) claims arising out of the execution of the search warrant and events connected to the execution of the search warrant at Plaintiffs' residence on July 31, 2007, and (b) lost earnings relating to her employment as a Mary Kay consultant and medical billing associate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Demoura v. Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 23, 2012
Case No. 1:09-cv-01344-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Demoura v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:ADDISON J. DEMOURA, JESSICA DEMOURA, and JOHN DOE, A Minor through his…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-01344-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)