From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demo v. Badie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 2005
14 A.D.3d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5161, 5161A

January 25, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 16, 2003, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and order, same court and Justice, entered May 10, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for reargument and adhered to the initial determination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.


Plaintiff fails to make out a claim for legal malpractice. Defendants' conduct was not a "but for" cause of the claimed losses ( Davis v. Klein, 88 NY2d 1008). Plaintiff failed to provide a nonconclusory reason — i.e., other than her subjective dissatisfaction with its terms — for failing to abide by the agreement with her sister, which would have removed the legal impediment to her conveyance of the jointly held property. Viewing the matter in this light, it is unnecessary for us to reach the other grounds advanced for affirmance.


Summaries of

Demo v. Badie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 2005
14 A.D.3d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Demo v. Badie

Case Details

Full title:MONA DEMO, Appellant, v. JAMES BADIE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 25, 2005

Citations

14 A.D.3d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
787 N.Y.S.2d 874

Citing Cases

Demo v. Badie

Demo further argues that, in the prior motion before me, I failed to accept as true all the allegations in…

Green v. Seeman

While plaintiff's malpractice claim appears to be premised on her assertions that defendants failed to…