Summary
In Deming v. Puleston (1873), 55 N.Y. (10 Sickles) 655, a corporate officer, against whom proceedings were brought under a statute similar to that here in question, defended on the ground that his term as trustee had expired when the debt was contracted.
Summary of this case from Eberts Cadillac Co. v. MillerOpinion
Submitted December 2, 1873
Decided December 9, 1873
Arthur P. Hinman for the appellant.
W.B. Putney for the respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.