From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deming v. Puleston

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 9, 1873
55 N.Y. 655 (N.Y. 1873)

Summary

In Deming v. Puleston (1873), 55 N.Y. (10 Sickles) 655, a corporate officer, against whom proceedings were brought under a statute similar to that here in question, defended on the ground that his term as trustee had expired when the debt was contracted.

Summary of this case from Eberts Cadillac Co. v. Miller

Opinion

Submitted December 2, 1873

Decided December 9, 1873

Arthur P. Hinman for the appellant.

W.B. Putney for the respondent.


Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Deming v. Puleston

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 9, 1873
55 N.Y. 655 (N.Y. 1873)

In Deming v. Puleston (1873), 55 N.Y. (10 Sickles) 655, a corporate officer, against whom proceedings were brought under a statute similar to that here in question, defended on the ground that his term as trustee had expired when the debt was contracted.

Summary of this case from Eberts Cadillac Co. v. Miller
Case details for

Deming v. Puleston

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE K. DEMING, Respondent, v . JOHN H. PULESTON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 9, 1873

Citations

55 N.Y. 655 (N.Y. 1873)

Citing Cases

Van Amburgh v. Baker

Here the defendants not only ceased to act as trustees, but before the expiration of the year for which they…

Eberts Cadillac Co. v. Miller

"No case precisely in point seems to arise in Michigan, but there are cases of like nature from other…