From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demery v. Littleton

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
May 17, 2021
CIVIL 1:20-CV-00067 (W.D. La. May. 17, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:20-CV-00067

05-17-2021

DR. MARIE DEMERY, Plaintiff v. BRIAN LITTLETON, Defendant


JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT

DAVID C. JOSEPH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [ECF No. 41], noting the absence of objection thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Extension to Effect Service of Process [Doc. No. 34] is DENIED, for failure to effect service for well more than one year.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this lawsuit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to prosecute under LR 41.3 for failure to effect service.

THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 17th day of May 2021.


Summaries of

Demery v. Littleton

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
May 17, 2021
CIVIL 1:20-CV-00067 (W.D. La. May. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Demery v. Littleton

Case Details

Full title:DR. MARIE DEMERY, Plaintiff v. BRIAN LITTLETON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: May 17, 2021

Citations

CIVIL 1:20-CV-00067 (W.D. La. May. 17, 2021)