From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demery v. Littleton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
May 17, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-00067 (W.D. La. May. 17, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-00067

05-17-2021

DR. MARIE DEMERY, Plaintiff v. BRIAN LITTLETON, Defendant


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [ECF No. 41], noting the absence of objection thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension to Effect Service of Process [Doc. No. 34] is DENIED, for failure to effect service for well more than one year.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this lawsuit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to prosecute under LR 41.3 for failure to effect service.

THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 17th day of May 2021.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Demery v. Littleton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
May 17, 2021
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-00067 (W.D. La. May. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Demery v. Littleton

Case Details

Full title:DR. MARIE DEMERY, Plaintiff v. BRIAN LITTLETON, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: May 17, 2021

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-00067 (W.D. La. May. 17, 2021)