From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeMatteo v. Ratzan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-01793

Argued November 12, 2002.

December 9, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated January 29, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it was time-barred.

Ivone, Devine Jensen, LLP, Lake Success, N.Y. (Brian E. Lee of counsel), for appellants.

Duffy, Duffy Burdo, Uniondale, N.Y. (James N. Licalzi and James R. Duffy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff made sufficient allegations of fraudulent concealment by the defendants of her injuries to, at the very least, raise triable issues of fact as to whether equitable estoppel is applicable to prevent the defendants from asserting the defense of the statute of limitations (see Simcuski v. Saeli, 44 N.Y.2d 442; Harkin v. Culleton, 156 A.D.2d 19; Szajna v. Rand, 131 A.D.2d 840). Therefore, the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint on the ground that it was time-barred.

FLORIO, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DeMatteo v. Ratzan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

DeMatteo v. Ratzan

Case Details

Full title:MARY ANNE DeMATTEO, respondent, v. SANFORD A. RATZAN, M.D., P.C., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 766

Citing Cases

Toste Farm Corp. v. Fowler

In light of plaintiffs' allegations, and the fact that discovery has not commenced, the Court concludes that…

Reisner v. Langenthal

Such allegations are sufficient to allow Plaintiffs to proceed with their equitable estoppel claim. See Nick…