From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeMartino v. Marion Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 28, 2012
Civil No. 11-6326-TC (D. Or. Feb. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-6326-TC

02-28-2012

THOMAS D. DeMARTINO, Plaintiff, v. MARION COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on January 11, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R, Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co.. Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202,1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

______________________________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

DeMartino v. Marion Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 28, 2012
Civil No. 11-6326-TC (D. Or. Feb. 28, 2012)
Case details for

DeMartino v. Marion Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS D. DeMARTINO, Plaintiff, v. MARION COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 28, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-6326-TC (D. Or. Feb. 28, 2012)