From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeMartino v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1996
225 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 18, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In order to vacate an order entered upon default, a party must demonstrate that there was an excusable delay and a meritorious cause of action or defense (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Putney v Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333; Fennell v Mason, 204 A.D.2d 599; Schiavetta v McKeon, 190 A.D.2d 724). In this case, the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating a meritorious cause of action. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion to vacate the order dated July 6, 1993, which granted the branch of the defendants' unopposed motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DeMartino v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1996
225 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

DeMartino v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.

Case Details

Full title:RALPH A. DEMARTINO, JR., Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 927