From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeMarquez v. Gallo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-10553.

May 23, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated August 18, 2004, which denied her motion to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404 and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

James Locantro, Rosedale, N.Y., for appellant.

Cheven, Keely Hatzis, New York, N.Y. (William B. Stock of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the dismissal is vacated, and the action is restored to the trial calendar.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to restore the action to the trial calendar after it had been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. The plaintiff demonstrated a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the failure to timely restore, a lack of intent to abandon the matter, and a lack of prejudice to the opposing party ( see Kranz v. Braverman, 15 AD3d 451). Thus, her motion should have been granted.


Summaries of

DeMarquez v. Gallo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

DeMarquez v. Gallo

Case Details

Full title:BRUNA DeMARQUEZ, Appellant, v. ANGELO GALLO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4040
814 N.Y.S.2d 528

Citing Cases

Demarquez v. Gallo

The Supreme Court denied that motion in an order dated August 18, 2004. The plaintiff appealed and, by…