From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeMarco v. Estlow

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 22, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 356 (App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

Argued September 15, 1952 —

Decided September 22, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

Mr. James D. Stockwell argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell Zink, attorneys).

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J. Super. 30.


Summaries of

DeMarco v. Estlow

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 22, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 356 (App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

DeMarco v. Estlow

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Sep 22, 1952

Citations

21 N.J. Super. 356 (App. Div. 1952)
91 A.2d 272

Citing Cases

Wall v. Hudson County Park Com

"No municipality or county shall be liable for injury to the person from the use of any public grounds,…

Transport Man. v. Am. Radiator Stand. San

Plaintiff does not deny the applicability of the Statute of Frauds, N.J.S.A. 25:1-5, but asserts that its bar…