From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeLuca v. Bensonhurst Grocery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2003
303 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-01348

Argued February 21, 2003.

March 17, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Bensonhurst Grocery and Shayer Ahmid Said appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), entered January 30, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $302,077.

McDonald Carroll Cohen Rayhill (Milber Makris Plousadis Seiden, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. [Thomas H. Kukowski] of counsel), for appellants.

Edward C. Tuozzo (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac and Lawrence Salvato] of counsel), for respondents.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the jury verdict finding that the injured plaintiff was negligent, but that her negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident, was not against the weight of the evidence, as the jury's finding was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129; Campbell v. Crimi, 267 A.D.2d 343, 344). Under the facts of this case, the issues were not "`so inextricably interwoven as to make it logically impossible to find negligence without also finding proximate cause'" (Reese v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 297 A.D.2d 793, quoting Rubin v. Pecoraro, 141 A.D.2d 525, 527; cf. Ferrante v. County of Nassau, 301 A.D.2d 565 [2d Dept, Jan. 21, 2003]).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, SCHMIDT and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DeLuca v. Bensonhurst Grocery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2003
303 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

DeLuca v. Bensonhurst Grocery

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN DeLUCA, ET AL., respondents, v. BENSONHURST GROCERY, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 458

Citing Cases

Weigl v. Quincy Specialties Co.

n fabric that had a tendency to melt and fuse to the wearer when exposed to flame, that the coat was sold as…

Schwarz v. Valente

d in substance that the jury's finding that the § 240(1) violation was not a substantial factor (proximate…