From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delpit v. Delpit

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 1, 1957
94 So. 2d 660 (La. 1957)

Opinion

No. 40968.

April 1, 1957.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE LOUIS H. YARRUT, J.

Leo L. Dubourg, New Orleans, for appellant.

Michael H. Bagot, New Orleans, for appellee.


At the time set for argument of this appeal attorney for the appellant appeared solely for the purpose of informing the court that no briefs would be filed in support of the appeal and that the case would not be argued. Appellant in this case has thus not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court. It is well settled that under these circumstances the judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. See Perkins v. Buchler, 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130, and numerous authorities there cited. We have nevertheless examined the record and find no error of law or fact in the judgment.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.


Summaries of

Delpit v. Delpit

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 1, 1957
94 So. 2d 660 (La. 1957)
Case details for

Delpit v. Delpit

Case Details

Full title:FERDINAND J. DELPIT v. VENETA CANDIFF DELPIT

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Apr 1, 1957

Citations

94 So. 2d 660 (La. 1957)
232 La. 539

Citing Cases

Simon v. Knipmeyer

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be…

Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be…