From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delphix Corp. v. Matal

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 12, 2017
2016-2063 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2067 2016-2068

12-12-2017

DELPHIX CORP., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAINA S. SHAMILOV; TODD RICHARD GREGORIAN, PHILLIP JOHN HAACK, San Francisco, CA. PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, COKE MORGAN STEWART.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00025, IPR2015-00026.

JUDGMENT

J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAINA S. SHAMILOV; TODD RICHARD GREGORIAN, PHILLIP JOHN HAACK, San Francisco, CA. PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, COKE MORGAN STEWART. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 12, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Delphix Corp. v. Matal

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 12, 2017
2016-2063 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Delphix Corp. v. Matal

Case Details

Full title:DELPHIX CORP., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 12, 2017

Citations

2016-2063 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2017)