From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delphin v. J. Morley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 2, 2021
1:19-cv-01076-NE-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01076-NE-SKO (PC)

08-02-2021

JEREMY DELPHIN, Plaintiff, v. J. MORLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 30-DAY DEADLINE

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On May 10, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations to dismiss Defendants Hammonds and Whitson without leave to amend. (Doc. 45.) The undersigned further recommended that this case proceed on Plaintiff's original complaint for claims of excessive force and/or failure to intercede against Defendants Morley, Villalobos, Banuelos, and Brown, and for claims of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Brown and Stewart, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Id. at 2.) On August 2, 2021, District Judge Dale A. Drozd adopted the findings and recommendations in full. (Doc. 46.)

Accordingly, within 30 days, the remaining defendants SHALL file a responsive pleading to the complaint, addressing only the remaining, operative claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Delphin v. J. Morley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 2, 2021
1:19-cv-01076-NE-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Delphin v. J. Morley

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY DELPHIN, Plaintiff, v. J. MORLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 2, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01076-NE-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2021)