From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deloney v. Haver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1339 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1339 JAM CKD P

09-12-2012

RICKEY B. DELONEY, Plaintiff, v. S. HAVER, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed July 26, 2012, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on five defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not complied with the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

______________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Deloney v. Haver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1339 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Deloney v. Haver

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY B. DELONEY, Plaintiff, v. S. HAVER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1339 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2012)