Opinion
No. 2007-10484.
September 16, 2008.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff's appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Aliotta, J.), dated October 29, 2007, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants Pablito Mejia and Venus Mejia and against them, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants.
Jonathan D'Agostino, Staten Island, N.Y. (Edward J. Pavia, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.
Robert P. Tusa (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for respondents.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Susan Paulson of counsel), for defendant City of New York (no brief filed).
Before: Santucci, J.P., Angiolillo, Eng and Chambers, JJ.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff contends that the jury verdict was against the weight of the evidence. "`A verdict should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the evidence so preponderates in favor of the moving party that it could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence'" ( Evers v Carroll, 17 AD3d 629, 631, quoting Schiskie v Fernan, 277 AD2d 441; see Kalpakis v County of Nassau, 289 AD2d 453; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129). In this case, the jury's conclusion finding in favor of the defendants Pablito Mejia and Venus Mejia was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence adduced at trial. Santucci, J.P., Angiolillo, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.