From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delkap Mgmt., Inc. v. N.Y.S. Div. of Human Rights

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 26, 2019
33 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2019)

Opinion

No. 47 SSM 4

03-26-2019

In the Matter of DELKAP MANAGEMENT, INC. et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

Caroline J. Downey, General Counsel, New York State Division of Human Rights, Bronx (Toni Ann Hollifield of counsel), for appellant. Sperber Denenberg & Kahan, P.C., New York City (Jacqueline Handel-Harbour of counsel), for respondents.


Caroline J. Downey, General Counsel, New York State Division of Human Rights, Bronx (Toni Ann Hollifield of counsel), for appellant.

Sperber Denenberg & Kahan, P.C., New York City (Jacqueline Handel-Harbour of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, petition dismissed in its entirety, and cross petition granted to the extent that the determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights is confirmed. The Appellate Division erroneously set aside a portion of the agency's determination.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey and Wilson concur. Judges Garcia and Feinman dissent and vote to affirm, insofar as appealed from, for reasons stated by the Appellate Division (see Matter of Delkap Mgt., Inc. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 144 A.D.3d 1148, 42 N.Y.S.3d 254 (2016) ).


Summaries of

Delkap Mgmt., Inc. v. N.Y.S. Div. of Human Rights

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 26, 2019
33 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2019)
Case details for

Delkap Mgmt., Inc. v. N.Y.S. Div. of Human Rights

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DELKAP MANAGEMENT, INC. et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Mar 26, 2019

Citations

33 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2019)
97 N.Y.S.3d 655
121 N.E.3d 283

Citing Cases

Lindenwood Vill. v. Denenberg

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND:The underlying facts of this case are set forth in detail in the decision…

1 Toms Point Lane Corp. v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

Here, there was substantial evidence in the record to conclude that Hough suffered from generalized anxiety…