From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delice v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Feb 21, 2020
291 So. 3d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-3354

02-21-2020

Wisner DELICE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Wisner Delice, Milton, pro se. No appearance for Appellee.


Wisner Delice, Milton, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously affirmed the order denying Appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and denied the motion for rehearing after having denied relief in the past from the same case, Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 48-2008-CF-002334-A-O. Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court, asserting claims stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 48-2008-CF-002334-A-O, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) ; State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).

ORFINGER, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Delice v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Feb 21, 2020
291 So. 3d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Delice v. State

Case Details

Full title:WISNER DELICE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 21, 2020

Citations

291 So. 3d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)