From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delgado v. Sandhu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2012
No. 1:11-CV-02016-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:11-CV-02016-AWI-SKO

09-06-2012

DANIEL DELGADO, Plaintiff, v. KIRPAL SINGH SANDHU, et al., Defendants.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado Bruce A. Neilson Attorney for Defendants Kirpal Singh Sandhu, Rupinder Sandhu, Narinder Singh, dba Circle 6 Exxon aka Valero Header


K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Daniel Delgado

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Daniel Delgado, through his attorney of record, and Defendants Kirpal Singh Sandhu, Rupinder Sandhu, Narinder Singh, dba Circle 6 Exxon aka Valero Header ("Defendants") through their attorney of record, the parties who have appeared in this action, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

_________________

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado

_________________

Bruce A. Neilson

Attorney for Defendants Kirpal Singh

Sandhu, Rupinder Sandhu, Narinder Singh,

dba Circle 6 Exxon aka Valero Header

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Delgado v. Sandhu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2012
No. 1:11-CV-02016-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Delgado v. Sandhu

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL DELGADO, Plaintiff, v. KIRPAL SINGH SANDHU, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

No. 1:11-CV-02016-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)