From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delgado v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 20, 2014
CASE NO. SA CV 13-300-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. SA CV 13-300-VAP (PJW)

02-20-2014

JOAQUIN ESTRADA DELGADO, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

___________________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Delgado v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 20, 2014
CASE NO. SA CV 13-300-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Delgado v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:JOAQUIN ESTRADA DELGADO, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. SA CV 13-300-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2014)