From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeLeon v. Keystone Freight Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2013
104 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-19

Jose DELEON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. KEYSTONE FREIGHT CORP., et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Foster & Mazzie, LLC, New York (Mario A. Batelli of counsel), for appellants. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.



Foster & Mazzie, LLC, New York (Mario A. Batelli of counsel), for appellants. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.
ANDRIAS, J.P., FRIEDMAN, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti–Hughes, J.), entered July 15, 2011, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, denied defendants' motion for a new trial on the issue of past lost earnings pursuant to CPLR 4404(a), deemed appeal from judgment, same court and Justice, entered August 9, 2011, awarding plaintiff, inter alia, $174,000.68 for past lost earnings from the date of the injury to the date of the verdict (CPLR 5520[c] ), and, so considered, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff sustained his burden of establishing the amount of his past lost earnings with reasonable certainty through the uncontroverted testimony of his economist ( see Papa v. City of New York, 194 A.D.2d 527, 531, 598 N.Y.S.2d 558 [2d Dept. 1993], lv. dismissed82 N.Y.2d 918, 610 N.Y.S.2d 146, 632 N.E.2d 457 [1994] ). Plaintiff also tendered sufficient medical testimony connecting his injuries to his inability to work for the entire period from the date of the accident to the date of the verdict ( cf. Razzaque v. Krakow Taxi, 238 A.D.2d 161, 162, 656 N.Y.S.2d 208 [1st Dept. 1997] ). The amount of damages is primarily a question for the jury, which was entitled to credit the testimony of plaintiff's treating physicians regarding plaintiff's physical condition and his ability to work, and to discredit the testimony of defendants' witnesses regarding that issue ( see Balsam v. City of New York, 298 A.D.2d 479, 748 N.Y.S.2d 779 [2d Dept. 2002] ).


Summaries of

DeLeon v. Keystone Freight Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2013
104 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

DeLeon v. Keystone Freight Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Jose DELEON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. KEYSTONE FREIGHT CORP., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
961 N.Y.S.2d 404
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1788

Citing Cases

Gumbs v. Flushing Town Ctr. Iii, L.P.

Although statistical life expectancy tables are useful, juries are routinely instructed that the tables are…