From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delaney v. Zaki

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 3, 2015
No. 9:13-CV-0648 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2015)

Opinion

No. 9:13-CV-0648 (DNH/TWD)

06-03-2015

CLARENCE DELANEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. DR. ZAKI, Physician/Medial Doctor, Mid-State Correctional Facility and Marcy Correctional Facility; DR. S. RAMINENI, Physician/Medial Doctor, Mid-State Correctional Facility and Marcy Correctional Facility; M. CZERWINSKI, Physician/Medial Doctor, Mid-State Correctional Facility and Marcy Correctional Facility; BRANDON J. SMITH, Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility; and DR. CARL KOENIGSMANN, Deputy Commissioner, Chief Medical Officer, DOCCS, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: CLARENCE DELANEY, JR. Plaintiff pro se TASC 87 Columbia Street Albany, NY 12210 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 OF COUNSEL: RACHEL M. KISH, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES: CLARENCE DELANEY, JR.
Plaintiff pro se
TASC
87 Columbia Street
Albany, NY 12210
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
OF COUNSEL: RACHEL M. KISH, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Clarence Delaney, Jr. brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 17, 2015, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e). No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed, despite plaintiff being afforded an extension of time to do so.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Zaki, Ramineni, Czerwinski, Smith, and Koenigsmann are DISMISSED without leave to amend;

2. Plaintiff's equal protection claim is DISMISSED with leave to amend;

3. Plaintiff's claims for defamation, mental and emotional distress, and medical negligence/medical malpractice are DISMISSED without prejudice to renew if plaintiff amends his federal equal protection claim;

4. If plaintiff wishes, he shall submit an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, curing the deficiencies in his equal protection claim addressed in the Report-Recommendation, along with asserting his claims for defamation, mental and emotional distress, and medical negligence/medical malpractice. Plaintiff is reminded that any amended complaint will replace his complaint in its entirety and no portion will be incorporated by reference;

5. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed in its entirety and this action closed without further order; and

6. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United States District Judge
Dated: June 3, 2015

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Delaney v. Zaki

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 3, 2015
No. 9:13-CV-0648 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Delaney v. Zaki

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE DELANEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. DR. ZAKI, Physician/Medial Doctor…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 3, 2015

Citations

No. 9:13-CV-0648 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2015)