From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delaney v. SimplexGrinnell LP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-5103 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-5103 MEJ

10-05-2011

COMERLIS DELANEY, Plaintiff, v. SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP, Defendant.

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. THOMAS M. McINERNEY MICHELLE M. LEETHAM Attorneys for Defendant SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP LAW OFFICE OF ARKADY ITKIN ARKADY ITKIN Attorney for Plaintiff COMERLIS DELANEY


THOMAS M. MCINERNEY (State Bar No. 162055)

MICHELLE M. LEETHAM (State Bar No. 124578)

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP

ARKADY ITKIN (State Bar No. 253194)

LAW OFFICE OF ARKADY ITKIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff COMERLIS DELANEY

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT

SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP'S DISPOSITIVE

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

OR ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO OCTOBER 7,

2011

Complaint Filed: October 12, 2010

Trial Date: March 12, 2012

Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James

Plaintiff COMERLIS DELANEY ("Plaintiff" or "Delaney") and Defendant SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP ("Defendant" or "SimplexGrinnell") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Delaney and Defendant SimplexGrinnell are preparing their Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts for filing with the Court pursuant to Civil Local Rule 56-2(b), in conjunction with Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment, which is currently due to be filed, served, and noticed by October 6, 2011;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel and Defendant's counsel have agreed that in order to complete their Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, Defendant SimplexGrinnell will have to and including October 7, 2011, to serve, file and notice Defendant SimplexGrinnell's Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Delaney;

WHEREAS, one previous time modification was requested in this case, extending the discovery cutoff from September 6, 2011, to September 14, 2011, which the Court granted on August 10, 2011;

WHEREAS, the Parties' request to extend the dispositive motion cutoff for Defendant SimplexGrinnell's filing of its Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment by one day from October 6, 2011, to October 7, 2011.

WHEREAS, this extension will not affect any other dates set by the Court, including the dates set for Plaintiff's opposition brief, Defendant's reply brief or the hearing date set for the Court to hear said motion;

THEREFORE, the parties request that this Court extend the dispositive motion cutoff to October 7, 2011, for the purpose of the parties completing their Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts.

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &

STEWART, P.C.

THOMAS M. McINERNEY

MICHELLE M. LEETHAM

Attorneys for Defendant

SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP

LAW OFFICE OF ARKADY ITKIN

ARKADY ITKIN

Attorney for Plaintiff COMERLIS DELANEY

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

In order to allow the Parties to complete its Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts in this action, the dispositive motion cutoff presently set for October 6, 2011, is continued to October 7, 2011.

Maria-Elena James

U.S. District Court Chief Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Delaney v. SimplexGrinnell LP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-5103 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Delaney v. SimplexGrinnell LP

Case Details

Full title:COMERLIS DELANEY, Plaintiff, v. SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-5103 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)