From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeLand v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Feb 16, 2012
No. 3:10-cv-744-HU (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cv-744-HU

02-16-2012

DAWN DAVINA DELAND, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation (#30) on January 12, 2010, in which he recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner' decision to deny plaintiff Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#30). Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

MARCO HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

DeLand v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Feb 16, 2012
No. 3:10-cv-744-HU (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2012)
Case details for

DeLand v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DAWN DAVINA DELAND, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Feb 16, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-cv-744-HU (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2012)