From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Del Vecchio v. County of Cayuga

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 20, 1964
197 N.E.2d 627 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 1964

Decided February 20, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, ARTHUR E. BLAUVELT, J.

Joseph Lynch for appellant-respondent in the first, second and third above-entitled actions and appellant in the fourth and fifth above-entitled actions.

Jay M. Friedman for respondents-appellants in the first, second and third above-entitled actions and for respondents in the fourth and fifth above-entitled actions.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that no negligence has been established against the County of Cayuga as matter of law.


Summaries of

Del Vecchio v. County of Cayuga

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 20, 1964
197 N.E.2d 627 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Del Vecchio v. County of Cayuga

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE D. DEL VECCHIO, Respondent-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CAYUGA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 20, 1964

Citations

197 N.E.2d 627 (N.Y. 1964)
197 N.E.2d 627
248 N.Y.S.2d 232

Citing Cases

Cottingham v. State of NY

Thus, when the accident giving rise to the present claim occurred, the above-recited provision of Vehicle and…

Cottingham v. State

Thus, when the accident giving rise to the present claim occurred, the above recited provision of Vehicle and…