From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Del Rosario v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB

07-13-2012

MARIA DEL ROSARIO CORONA, AS HEIR OF THE ESTATE OF OSCAR CRUZ, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. MARTIN BITER, et al., Defendants.

Manu Pradhan Attorneys for Plaintiffs ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Kelli M. Hammond Attorney for Defendants


BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

WARREN E. GEORGE (SBN 53588)

MANU PRADHAN (SBN 253026)

EDWARD A. ANDREWS (SBN 268479)

The Water Garden

COURTNEY E. SMITH (SBN 273598)

1117 S. California Avenue

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Maria del Rosario

Corona and Andres Santana

STIPULATION REGARDING

EXPERT DISCLOSURES; ORDER

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(2), the parties stipulate to an extension of the deadline regarding expert disclosures. Disclosures are due on July 17, 2012. (Dkt. No. 129.) This deadline was previously extended because of the need to extend fact discovery. (Id.)

A short extension of time is necessary for the disclosures for a correctional expert Plaintiffs intend to call at trial. The correctional expert has recently experienced a death in the family. Since then, Plaintiffs' contact with the expert has been extremely limited, and Plaintiffs do not currently know the expert's availability, or whether he is able to devote sufficient time to the disclosures before they are due on the 17th. At the same time, Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' summary judgment motion is due August 3, 2012. (Dkt. No. 151.) So as not to interfere with that calendar item, and to minimize prejudice to Defendants, Plaintiffs request that the disclosure deadline for their correctional expert be extended until August 3. Plaintiffs believe their expert should be able to complete disclosures by August 3.

Therefore, the parties stipulate that the disclosures for Plaintiffs' correctional expert will be due on August 3. This stipulation does not affect the disclosure date for any other experts subject to a disclosure obligation.

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

By: _____________

Manu Pradhan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA

By: _____________

Kelli M. Hammond

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE showing, IT IS SO ORDERED that the parties' stipulation regarding expert disclosures is approved. The disclosures for Plaintiffs' correctional expert shall occur on or before August 3, 2012. All other disclosures shall occur on or before July 17, 2012, consistent with this Court's prior order (Dkt. No. 129).

By: ______________________________

Judge, United States District Court for the

Eastern District of California

ATTESTATION OF FILER

The signatories to this document are myself and Kelli Hammond, and I have obtained Ms. Hammond's concurrence to sign this document on her behalf.

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

By: __________

Manu Pradhan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Del Rosario v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Del Rosario v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:MARIA DEL ROSARIO CORONA, AS HEIR OF THE ESTATE OF OSCAR CRUZ, et. al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)