From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Del Giudice v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 5, 1968
396 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

Nos. 22075, 22075A.

June 5, 1968.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Charles H. Carr, District Judge.

Luke McKissack, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

William M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Division, Gabriel A. Gutterrez, Asst. U.S. Atty., Arthur A. Dickerman, Dept. of Health, Education Welfare, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.


Appellant stands convicted of sale (and possession for sale) of LSD-25 in violation of the 1965 amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The sole question on appeal is the constitutionality of that Act with which question we have dealt in our opinion in Deyo v. United States, 9 Cir., 396 F.2d 595, filed this day. For the reasons there set forth, judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Del Giudice v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 5, 1968
396 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Del Giudice v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Denis V. DEL GIUDICE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 1968

Citations

396 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Heiman

This Court has already rejected this argument in upholding the constitutionality of section 331(q)(2). Deyo…