From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeJulio v. Wulf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 12, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 against a party who "refuses to obey an order for disclosure or wilfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed" is a matter within the discretion of the court (CPLR 3126; see, Kubacka v. Town of N. Hempstead, 240 A.D.2d 374; Soto v. City of Long Beach, 197 A.D.2d 615). The defendants' willful and contumacious conduct can be inferred from their continued adjournment of scheduled depositions, the commencement of a baseless third-party action, and their failure to comply with the court's order directing depositions on a date certain without an adequate excuse ( see, Castrignano v. Flynn, 252 A.D.2d 352; Brady v. County of Nassau, 234 A.D.2d 408; Garcia v. Kraniotakis, 232 A.D.2d 369).


Summaries of

DeJulio v. Wulf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

DeJulio v. Wulf

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS DeJULIO, Respondent, v. STEVEN WULF et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 727

Citing Cases

Polanco v. Duran

While the nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 is a matter within…

Nowak v. Veira

The nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 against a party who "refuses to…