From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deitz v. Univ. of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 1, 2011
Civil Action No. 95-cv-02756-WDM-OES (D. Colo. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 95-cv-02756-WDM-OES

08-01-2011

SHEILA R. DEITZ, Plaintiff, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER, COLORADO SEMINARY, et al., Defendants.


Senior Judge Walker D. Miller


ORDER

This matter is before me concerning the Claimant Johnson Estate's Motion to Stay. The Defendants have responded and Claimant Johnson has now filed a Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 599). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d), the Claimant may obtain a stay by posting a supersedeas bond. Johnson has not shown good cause for varying the usual procedure.

Accordingly, it is ordered:

1. Claimant Johnson Estate's Motion for Stay or Distribution of Funds Held in Court Registry Pending Appeal (ECF No. 595) is denied;

2. My previous order (ECF No. 596) staying distribution of monies in the Court Registry shall continue until August 10, 2011, to allow time for the Estate to obtain a stay upon posting of a supersedeas bond.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, on August 1, 2011

BY THE COURT:

Walker D. Miller

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Deitz v. Univ. of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 1, 2011
Civil Action No. 95-cv-02756-WDM-OES (D. Colo. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Deitz v. Univ. of Denver

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA R. DEITZ, Plaintiff, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER, COLORADO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 95-cv-02756-WDM-OES (D. Colo. Aug. 1, 2011)