Opinion
No. CIV S-09-3243 DAD PS.
February 8, 2010
ORDER
On January 29, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to show why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In a timely written response, plaintiff states that the necessary documents were provided to the U.S. Marshal. Although plaintiff states that a proof of service is enclosed, the docket does not reflect the filing of such a document. Plaintiff has not yet provided the court with a statement indicating the date on which the required documents were provided to the U.S. Marshal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall file the statement within five days.