From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deherrera v. Options Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 28, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01733-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01733-WJM-BNB.

September 28, 2011


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND AND REMAND


On July 1, 2011, Defendants removed this action from Denver District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 based on Plaintiff's assertion of a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) No scheduling conference has been held in this case to date.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and Remand. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff seeks to file a second amended complaint that states no federal claims and, based on the lack of a federal claim, argues that the Court should remand the case to state court. Defendant has not opposed the Motion. Because the only federal claim has been dropped from this case, the Court finds that remand would best serve the principles of economy, convenience, fairness, and comity. See Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 357 (1988).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and Remand is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED to the District Court in Denver County, Colorado.

The Court notes that the Motion requests remand to the District Court in El Paso County, Colorado. However, the Court can only remand an action to the State court from which it was removed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).


Summaries of

Deherrera v. Options Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 28, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01733-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Deherrera v. Options Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF ANGEL DEHERRERA, and SABRINA DEHERRERA, Plaintiffs, v. OPTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01733-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2011)